Dilemmatic Position of State Civil Apparatus (ASN)
Maintaining Neutrality or Being Taken by Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v2i2.95Kata Kunci:
bureaucracy, ASN neutrality, KASN, BawasluAbstrak
This article investigates the dilemma faced by the ASN in maintaining neutrality amidst political dynamics, particularly during regional head elections (Pilkada) in Indonesia. The study explores the ASN's susceptibility to being exploited for electoral purposes and evaluates how they maintain neutrality according to laws and regulations. Additionally, the article discusses the challenges ASN faces in adhering to the principle of neutrality and potential solutions to these problems. By examining data from the State Civil Apparatus Commission (KASN) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) concerning violations of ASN neutrality, the study identifies factors that contribute to ASN involvement in local political contests and the resulting neutrality breaches. The study also underscores the worrisome situation concerning the integrity and neutrality of Indonesia's ASN in fulfilling their duties and responsibilities. The three identified phenomena—position buying and selling, instant career pursuit, and kinship culture or spoil system—indicate political intervention in bureaucracy, resulting in the appointment of incompetent individuals and reduced public service quality. The concerning situation regarding ASN's integrity and neutrality highlights the need for further efforts in implementing bureaucratic reform and strengthening the merit system in Indonesia.
Unduhan
Referensi
Berenschot, W., & Mulder, P. (2019). Explaining Regional Variation in Local Governance: Clientelism and State-Dependency in Indonesia. World Development, 122, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.021
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buehler, M., Nataatmadja, R., & Anugrah, I. (2021). Limitations to Subnational Authoritarianism: Indonesian Local Government Head Elections in Comparative Perspective. Regional and Federal Studies, 31(3), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1918388
Choi, N. (2007). Local Elections and Democracy in Indonesia: The Riau Archipelago. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(3), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701408650
Clifford, J. G. (2014). Politics Bureaucratic. The Journal of American History, 77(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/2078648
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset: Memilih di antara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Diamond, L. (2021). Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes Methods, and Causes. Democratization, 28(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517
Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Habibi, M. (2021). A regional head election’s political corruption and new styles of clientelism. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 34(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v34i42021.417-430
Habibi, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2021). Electoral Manipulations and Fraud Political Contestation: The Case of Regional Head Election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/: 10.15294/ipsr.v6i1.23447
Hanafi, R. I. (2014). Pemilihan Langsung Kepala Daerah di Indonesia: Beberapa Catatan Kritis Untuk Partai Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v11i2.197
Handoyo. (2019). BKN: 99,5% pelanggar netralitas ASN berstatus pegawai instansi daerah. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from kontan.co.id website: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/bkn-995-pelanggar-netralitas-asn-berstatus-pegawai-instansi-daerah
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hayat. (2020). Paradigm to Shared Governance Good Governance Through Political System Indonesia. Jurnal Aristo (Social, Politic, Humaniora), 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v8i1.2270
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
Ishak, A. F., & Utomo, T. W. W. (2014). Kebijakan Desentralisasi dan Implementasi Otonomi Daerah di Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 6(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v6i2.57
Kartini, D. S. (2019). Civil Servant Neutrality on 2019 General Election in Indonesia. Central European Journal of International & Security Studies, 13(4), 397–410. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/b7031394193de6ebeaf8a0415bbfa586/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2069611
KASN. (2021). Hasil Survei KASN: Politisasi Birokrasi Terus Mengancam, Sebagian ASN Minta Hak Politik Dicabut. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN) website: https://kasn.go.id/id/publikasi/hasil-survei-kasn-politisasi-birokrasi-terus-mengancam-sebagian-asn-minta-hak-politik-dicabut
Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/976648
Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J. (1992). The Impact of Representative Bureaucracies: Educational Systems and Public Policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409202200301
Mietzner, M. (2012). Indonesia’s Democratic Stagnation: Anti-Reformist Elites and Resilient Civil Society. Democratization, 19(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620
Perdana, G. (2019). Menjaga Netralitas ASN dari Politisasi Birokrasi (Protecting The ASN Neutrality From Bureaucracy Politicization). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 10(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1177
Rahman, M. S. (2014). Bureaucratic Perceptions to the Politics–Bureaucracy Relations in Bangladesh: A Moral Dilemma in between Political Neutrality and Responsiveness. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2014.925407
Rockman, B. A. (2020). Bureaucracy, Power, Policy, and the State. In The state of public bureaucracy (pp. 141–170). London: Routledge.
Setiawan, H. (2022). Rethinking Patterns Development of Aceh’s Socio-Economic Welfare After Two Decades of Implementing Asymmetric Autonomy “Special Autonomy.” Journal of Government and Political Issues, 2(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v2i1.27
Shirk, D. A. (2007). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico by Beatriz Magaloni. Political Science Quarterly, 122(3), 524–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2007.tb01673.x
Smith, B. C. (1988). Bureaucracy and Political Power. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x
Tomsa, D. (2009). Electoral Democracy in a Divided Society: The 2008 Gubernatorial Election in Maluku, Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 17(2), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009788745877
Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, Administration & Development making The State Work. New York: Springer.
Wahyu, Y. (2020). Urgensi Menjaga Netralitas ASN. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from Kompas.id website: https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2020/11/09/urgensi-menjaga-netralitas-asn
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Vol. 2). California: University of California press.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Saepudin Saepudin, Dana Pratiwi
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
